Menu

Shop

Garage

Cart

Account

Products to Compare (max of 3)
X
Compare These Parts

Top 10 Secrets of the C3 Corvette | General Motors R&D Lore

1/3/2025
Add Article To List
The C3 Corvette was based off of the incredibly popular Mako Shark II prototype.

We’re up to eight generations of Chevrolet’s halo sports car, the Corvette. Among those, the third generation, also known as the C3, which ran from 1968 until 1982 has historically been the least loved. Honestly, there are a few reasons for that. The new design was polarizing. EPA regulations continually choked off power, while safety regulations required changing some of the car’s best features. Add in the addition of modern conveniences created a continuous battle against ballooning weight, and that’s just the top of the list why the C3 gets no respect.

But time heals all wounds. These days the C3 corvette is enjoying a bit of a resurgence in popularity. It has become retro cool, and we think it didn’t come a moment too soon. So we’re here to help you get ahead of the curve. Enjoy these 10 very cool--and unusual--facts about the third generation of the Chevrolet Corvette. We bet at least one or two of them you didn’t know.

#1 The C3 Was Nearly Mid-Engine

Did you know that the C3 Corvette almost became the first mid-engine Corvette? Most car enthusiasts are aware that the current generation, the C8, holds that title. General Motors made a big splash about it, and the C8 is indeed a fantastic car. But back in 1968, the C3 was incredibly close to taking that honor.

Early C3 Corvettes with chrome bumpers are fan favorites, but Chevrolet had to switch to a new design due to five mph bumper regulations.

It all started in 1964 when plans were laid out to make the successor to the C2 Corvette a world-class sports car with a mid-engine layout for better weight distribution and handling. This idea wasn’t just a passing thought; it was championed by none other than Zora Arkus-Duntov, known as the father of the Corvette, along with Bill Mitchell, GM’s vice president of design, and the famous designer Larry Shinoda. This team came up with concepts that placed the engine behind the driver’s seat.

Duntov had a vision for the next generation Corvette to compete head-to-head with Ferrari. He believed that a mid-engine layout was crucial for this. Moving the engine to the rear would not only balance the weight better but also allow for a smaller, lower nose to improve the car’s aerodynamics. Proof of this vision can be seen in the CERV I and II (Chevrolet Engineering Research Vehicle). The CERV I, which debuted in 1960, was a mid-engine test platform that looked a lot like a Formula 1 car from that era. The following year, the CERV II was introduced, featuring a full fiberglass body and a 500-horsepower engine powering all four wheels. It was used for several years to test various components.

Duntov was eager to apply what he learned from the CERV II to create his dream mid-engine Corvette. Unfortunately, reality intervened. Despite Chevrolet already having the Corvair, which was produced from 1960 to 1969, too many components would have needed to be designed from scratch, making the development costs simply too high. The second-generation Sting Ray Corvette was already a huge success, and GM executives didn’t see a reason to change a winning formula. GM chairman and CEO Richard Gerstenberg famously said, “Why would we change the Corvette? We sell every one we can make.” Still, Duntov and Mitchell never gave up on the idea. To showcase what a future mid-engine Corvette could look like, Duntov unveiled the experimental prototype 880, also known as the Astro II concept, in 1968. The Astro II was a stunning vehicle, resembling a Lamborghini Miura. It could have made a significant impact if it had been produced and performed as well as it looked, but sadly, it wasn’t meant to be

#2 The L83 Cross-Fire Came With Plenty Of Firsts

The L83 Cross-Fire V8 debuted in the very last year of the C3 (1982) and it only lasted until 1984 (which is quite short when you consider that there wasn't a 1983 model year Corvette). Despite debuting to great hype, the Cross-Fire engine was plagued with problems and put out to pasture for a better design after just three years. Much of the engine’s problems could be blamed on growing pains and trying to get a handle on new technology. For example, Chevrolet engineers tried using two throttle bodies to help improve fuel distribution (also because at the time they couldn’t make a single throttle body large enough to properly fuel a 350 cubic inch V8), but the flat intake manifold required to keep everything under the Corvette’s low-slung hood was a particularly poor design and killed most of the advantage created by the EFI system. The Cross Plane intake manifold placed a throttle body on either side instead of down the center and was extremely compromised. Fuel tended to puddle in the runners, so to keep the air speed up so the fuel would stay in suspension, Chevrolet reduced the runner size significantly. This worked, but it effectively choked off the engine so that peak torque was at a measly 2,800 rpm, and by 4,000 rpm the engine was just about done. Plus, the fuel efficiency gains that Chevrolet brass had hoped for just weren’t there.

Debuting in 1982, the L83 Cross-Fire V8 was Corvette’s first EFI engine since the 1950s, but design flaws led to a short run. It produced 205 hp and 290 lb-ft of torque before being replaced by the L98 in 1984. Photo courtesy of Ken Allen.

Still, the Cross-Fire came with so many innovations, it definitely is worth remembering as a ground-breaking engine. Consider this list: It was the first fuel injected engine in a Corvette since the “Fuelie” engines of the 1950s and 1960s, it was the only engine available for Corvette models in both 1982 and 1984 (remember, there was no 1983 model), and it was the first to be mated to the new 700-R4 transmission. Oh, and it was also one of the first GM vehicles to come with an in-tank fuel pump. Plus, the L83 Cross-Fire managed 205 horsepower and 290 pound feet of torque. That may not sound like much, but it was 15 better than the previous year’s engine and more than any other base Corvette up to that time that came with a catalytic converter. This, however, was an age of rapid advancement in EFI technology, and the Cross-Fire was put out to pasture after 1984 when it was replaced by the much improved L98 350 cubic inch V8 which boasted 230 horsepower and 330 pound feet of torque right out of the gate.

#3 The Mako

Corvette’s history is packed with incredibly cool concept cars, and one of the coolest has to be the Mako Shark II. Larry Shinoda designed the Mako Shark II to bring Bill Mitchell’s vision for the upcoming C3 Corvette to life. Mitchell’s design brief was quite detailed: he wanted a narrow, slim center section and coupe body, a tapered tail, a seamless blend of the upper and lower body, and prominent wheels with fenders that were distinct yet organically integrated into the main body. And Shinoda nailed it. The Mako Shark II looks a lot like the C3 Corvette because it was so popular on the car show circuit that GM decided to turn it into a production car. But the concept was a bit ahead of its time. For instance, even though the Mako Shark II wasn’t a convertible, its roof was hinged to open up with the door, making it easier to get in and out. It also had a squared-off steering wheel and a super futuristic interior that wasn’t very practical for actual driving. The body, while stunning, had its issues too. It created aerodynamic lift at high speeds, making the car feel unstable. The fender flares and narrow rear window also made visibility tricky.

The Mako Shark I and Mako Shark II prototype/concept cars. Photo courtesy of the General Motor's Heritage Center.

So, the aggressive look of the Mako Shark II had to be toned down for the production version of the C3. Originally, the third-generation Corvette was supposed to debut as a 1967 model, but turning the Mako Shark II concept into a production car was so challenging that the C3 didn’t hit the market until 1968. Still, the resemblance between the final production version and the concept is remarkable. But the story doesn’t end there. Many people were set on the Mako Shark II, and a 1968 Corvette, as good as it looked, just wouldn’t do. So, car customizer Joe Silva created a fiberglass kit to turn a '68 Corvette into a slightly modified Mako Shark. He partnered with Joel Rosen of Baldwin Motion to handle the mechanicals, and they called it the “Baldwin Maco Shark.” Interestingly, they changed the spelling from “Mako” to “Maco” to avoid copyright issues. Apparently, Baldwin Motion only produced six of these Maco Sharks, so if you ever find one, grab it quick!

#4 Fiberglass To Steel

The Corvette is famous for having a lightweight, rust-proof body formed from fiberglass. But there was a significant change made midway through the C3 generation that is causing some real rust issues for owners. The C3 Corvette started out with fiberglass floors, just like the C2 before it. But Chevrolet switched them out to steel beginning with the 1976 model for a reason you might not expect. Government regulations required the implementation of catalytic converters to reduce smog and other pollutants. But the cats not only collected harmful particles that would have otherwise been released into the air, they also liked heat. They got so hot, in fact, that they would damage the Vette’s fiberglass floors.

Later C3 models switched to steel floor boards to handle catalytic converter heat, but they became infamous for rust issues, as shown here.

So Chevrolet made the switch to steel stampings. That was fine and all because the steel could resist the heat of the catalytic converters no problem. But the problem is C3 Corvettes are notorious for leaks--especially when the seals for the T-top roofs go bad. Rusted floors are the bane of C3 Corvettes from 1976 through the end of the generation in ‘82, so if you are looking to purchase one make sure to look underneath the carpet for rust eating its way through those steel floor boards.

#5 The Government Legislates a Pig

These days, if you talk to anyone who has driven an original C3 Corvette, they’ll probably describe it as a bit of a pig. And if their experience is with a later model, they’re not wrong. Let’s be honest here: Compared to modern cars, even basic sedans, the C3 Corvette is slow, full of rattles, and not super comfortable to drive. But that reputation mostly comes from the later model years of the C3, and it’s not entirely Chevrolet’s fault. The early C3 Corvettes were actually quite powerful. For example, in 1969, you could opt for the L88 package and get a 427 cubic inch big block engine rated at 435 horsepower. Legend has it that this engine was underrated from the factory, and you could actually get close to 580 horsepower by swapping out the stock exhaust manifolds for long tube headers. If you were more into cornering than drag racing, between 1970 and 1972 you could get the LT1 small block engine. It saved a couple hundred pounds and still made 370 horsepower. The LT1 was a high-revving engine thanks to solid lifters, but it was a bit high-strung so you couldn’t have it with air conditioning. Still, an LT1-equipped Corvette could run the quarter mile in 14.4 seconds at 101.7 mph, which was on par with a Porsche at the time but at half the price. But the days of high-performance Chevrolet engines were numbered. Even though the Corvette was America’s only sports car at the time, it wasn’t immune to the changes.

The L88 427 big block was the king of C3 horsepower, but as this generation of Corvette soldiered on big blocks quietly went away and small block horsepower continued to decline.

Increasingly stringent government regulations started to choke off power as GM tried to keep engines compliant. For example, unleaded fuels meant high compression engines were no longer practical, so as compression went down the horsepower curve followed. On top of that, the 1970s brought in pollution control systems like catalytic converters and smog pumps, which further killed power. Over the years, manufacturers have figured out how to build clean-burning engines that still make great power, but back then the technology just wasn’t there. Finally, in 1972 GM started rating their engines according to SAE net horsepower rules instead of the old SAE gross. This meant they tested the engines with the actual exhaust manifolds and accessory drives like the water pump and power steering pump. So while the 454 cubic inch LS5 big block was rated at 365 horsepower in 1971, it dropped to just 270 in 1972. Some of this was due to smog control measures, and some was due to the change in rating systems. Even worse, if you bought a Corvette in California in 1975, the only engine available was a small block choked down to a miserable 165 horsepower. Just for comparison, the base model 2024 Chevrolet Malibu makes 163 horsepower from its tiny 1.5-liter turbo 4-cylinder engine. And the 2024 Corvette starts at 490 horsepower and only goes up from there depending on the model. We’ve come a long way! So, if you were driving a late 1970s or early 1980s C3 Corvette and said, “They just don’t make them like they used to,” you are absolutely right!

#6 Fender Vents Aren’t Decoration

The fender vents on the C3 Corvette changed looks over the years, but they were always there and always functional. These vents weren’t just for show; they were actually quite critical. The C3 Corvette’s low-slung hood, Coke bottle shape and minimal grille created some challenges when it came to keeping the engine properly cooled. First off, that small grille opening meant there was minimal air getting into the radiator. Plus, the way the hood and fenders wrapped so tightly around the engine meant any heat created was held right up against it. In later models, the bumper cover was redesigned to help move more air through the grille and to the radiator, and there were even efforts to route fresh air to the air cleaner. But the most important thing was how well those fender vents allowed hot air to escape from the engine compartment. These days, many modern cars are decorated with all kinds of slits and intake ports, and you always have to look twice to see if they’re actually functional or just decorative. But in the case of the C3 those gill slits behind the front wheels didn’t just look fantastic, they actually served a very useful purpose. Functional fender vents aside, one of the most important improvements for drivability when restoring a C3 is upgrading to a larger aluminum radiator. A direct fit C3 radiator upgrade can fit in place of your factory unit to address the inherent cooling flaws of the C3 design without major modifications or changes to the unique C3 radiator mounting position.

While always functional in nature, extracting hot air from the cramped engine compartment, the C3's front fender vent styling changed several times over the course of the C3 generation. Images courtesy of Unsplash.

#7 Why The Bumpers Changed

While we are on the topic of government influences, let's talk bumpers. Since the C3 Corvette was in production from 1968 all the way until 1982, there were plenty of changes along the way. But the biggest one most people are interested in is chrome bumper Corvettes versus rubber bumpers. Most people agree that the best looking versions of the C3 are from 1968 until 1972, when chrome bumpers adorned both the front and rear of the car. But Chevrolet made the switch to urethane front bumper covers in 1973, while the rear bumper was allowed to remain until 1974. Those changes weren’t a choice, they were because of US government regulations that a vehicle should be outfitted with bumpers that can withstand a 5 mile an hour impact without damage to the car. Those regulations required a much more robust bumper structure for the Corvette which led to the disappearance of the chrome bumpers. You may be on either side of the fence whether you prefer the old school chrome bumpers or the more modern look of the urethane bumper covers, but there is a pretty cool story about how Chevrolet engineers decided to attack the problem that isn't very well known.

The C3 Corvette is the perfect canvas for a restomod-style build, and the later urethane bumpers often help achieve the right look, as this 1980-1982 version displays here.

Many cars at the time went with heavy steel bumpers that had a sort of shock absorber behind them in order to meet the 5 mph collision requirement. But Corvette engineers felt that would add too much weight way out in front of the front tires and in turn hurt the Corvette's handling. Their solution was to build a lightweight collapsible steel bumper and hide it underneath a urethane bumper cover. In a collision less than 5 mph, the urethane cover would pop back out and appear unharmed, but the actual steel bumper would have collapsed. It would have to be replaced before the car could withstand another low speed impact, but at least the design shaved a few pounds of weight off the car. By making the inner bumper a sacrificial piece they were able to meet the requirements while also making it a lot lighter than other typical bumpers used at the time. The new urethane bumpers on the 1973 Corvette did stick out 3 inches farther than the chrome bumper on the previous model, but considering the requirements that they had to meet, we think Chevrolet’s engineers did a great job taking lemons and making lemonade.

#8 Glass Out

One of the coolest features of the early C3 Corvettes was the removable rear glass. It was a pretty popular feature back in the day, but it was removed with the 1973 model. Why? Well, it turns out Zora Arkus-Duntov himself decided it wasn’t necessary. Duntov explained that you could pull the T-tops, roll down both windows, and cruise at 140 miles per hour with no wind buffeting inside the cabin as long as the rear glass was in place. Yes, 140 miles per hour—as if that’s something everyone does regularly! But if you removed the rear glass, the wind buffeting got annoying even at legal road speeds. So Duntov decided the glass didn’t need to be removable after all, and that really cool feature was simply deleted. Still, the fact that he referenced cabin air quality at 140 miles an hour, as if people drove their Corvettes at that speed all the time, is a pretty awesome flex.

A removable rear glass panel was a unique feature of early C3 Corvettes. Zora Arkus-Dontov himself noted extra wind turbulence with the glass out, and as such it was deleted after 1972.

#9 T-Tops Provided Support

When the C3 Corvette debuted in 1968, it became the first production American car to be outfitted with T-tops. T-tops since then have become pretty iconic with the C3, but the two-piece removable roof was actually a Band-Aid and not a design feature from the start. When the C3 was first designed, engineers wanted it to have a fully removable, one piece targa top roof. That would sort of follow the Mako Shark’s two-piece lift off roof design. But unfortunately, the chassis simply wasn't stiff enough and flexed without the roof in place. Even with the roof on it squeaked and rattled so much the design team decided that a one-piece removable roof just wasn't doable. As a fix, they came up with a roof design that placed a beam down the center and then made two removable pieces that connected on either side. And just like that, we have T-tops! That center beam isn't just there to give the T-top pieces a place to mount up. It is actually a structural member to help stiffen up the chassis. So, because Chevrolet wasn’t able to build a chassis that was sufficiently stiff, the C3 Corvette got its iconic T-tops instead of a targa top.

While a true targa-style top would come later, the C3's T-tops provided the best open air cruising ability while maintaining chassis rigidity via the center brace.

#10 Shaving Weight

Urethane bumpers weren’t the only big change for the Corvette in 1973. In fact, it was a significant year for the Corvette. While it might not look drastically different at first glance, the ‘73 Corvette marked a shift from a pure sports car to more of a sports tourer. This meant it could comfortably eat up miles on the highway while still being able to handle mountain roads or racetracks on the weekends. Some of the big changes weren’t immediately visible, but they made a huge difference in how well built the Corvette felt. Starting in 1973, an asphalt-based sound deadener was sprayed on the floorboards and other interior body panels. They also added sound-deadening blankets under the hood and behind the dash, along with rubber body mounts. Previously, all the body mounts had been solid. These changes made the car much quieter inside. For example, a small block with a manual transmission went from 81 decibels at 70 mph in the 1972 model to 79 decibels in 1973. The quietest example was surprisingly a 454 cubic inch big block with an automatic transmission, which was down to 77 decibels at 70 mph.

Emissions and safety regs added weight to the C3, but Chevy fought back with iconic aluminum wheels to keep it lighter.

However, all these efforts to reduce cabin noise, along with the switch to beefier bumpers and guard beams in the doors for side impact protection, added quite a bit of weight to the car. To counter this, engineers put the 1973 Corvette on a strict weight loss program. They cut 10 pounds by removing the flaps and mechanical linkages that hid the windshield wipers in front of the windshield. This was also the start of the C3 Corvette’s iconic aluminum wheels made by American Racing Equipment, which shaved off 35 pounds by replacing the steel wheels and their hubcaps. Over the years, Chevrolet engineers took many more steps to keep the Corvette’s weight down. By 1980, the Corvette had gained so much weight that it was nearly as heavy as some of the company’s steel-bodied cars that could carry four or more passengers. So, they took measures to cut an incredible 238 pounds. This included redesigning the energy-absorbing bumpers to be mostly fiberglass. In 1980, the T-tops were also made from a special fiberglass with lightweight glass beads to help cut weight. While we often think of fiberglass as lightweight, all that resin can be pretty heavy. Additionally, the 1980 model switched to thinner windshield and door glass and replaced the cast iron rear differential case with aluminum. They also used an aluminum intake manifold for the L48 small block instead of cast iron. Cutting 238 pounds is no small feat, but unfortunately, other issues kept the Corvette from truly shining. At the time, Car and Driver magazine noted that even with the reduced weight, the car’s acceleration and braking tests showed no real improvement. We can only imagine how bad it would have been if Chevrolet engineers had let the Corvette get even heavier.

Related Articles

The History of Bell Auto Parts | America's First Speed Shop
3/15/2024
SoCal's first speed shop, Bell Auto Parts, pioneered the aftermarket with OHV Ford Flatheads, Cragar Mags, and racing helmets in the 1920s racing scene
The Camfather: Ed Iskenderian | Episode 21
10/18/2021
For our final episode of Season 2, we got to speak with a legend. But Ed Iskenderian isn't just a legend. He made his mark at the birth of hot rodding and has been shaping its course ever since.
Historic Drag Cars from the Museum of American Speed
by Joe McCollough - Posted in News
6/24/2021
The '21 season marks the 70th year of NHRA drag racing. Here's look at a few great drag cars from that 70 year history from the Museum of American Speed.
Famous Show Cars that Became Model Kits from the Museum of American Speed
by Joe McCollough - Posted in News
2/23/2021
These 60's show rods caused a sensation when they hit the car show circuit, but many of us remember them as the miniature plastic creations that we stuck together in the basements and on the kitchen tables of our youth.
The Dale
by Joe McCollough - Posted in News
2/8/2021
The Dale is more than just a strange little yellow car. This is a story like no other...
Camaro Curb Weight Reference Guide | Camaro Weight by Year
by Mark Houlahan - Posted in Tech
4/18/2025
Knowing how much your generation of Camaro weighs will help you determine shock settings, spring choices, and suspension setup.
SBC vs LS Showdown | Dimensions for Swaps, Weight, HP, Specs
by Mark Houlahan - Posted in Tech
4/8/2025
Small block Chevy V8 or the modern LS V8? Which one comes out on top as the best engine to swap into your ride?
LS vs LT Engine: Which Swap is Better? HP, Specs & Fitment Differences
by Mark Houlahan - Posted in Tech
3/27/2025
Comparing GM’s LS V8 engine to the high-tech LT V8 engine. Which is better for your performance needs and budget?
How To Adjust, Install & Troubleshoot Throttle Cable & Kickdown Cables
by Jefferson Bryant - Posted in Tech
3/19/2025
Learn what throttle and kickdown cables do, how to install them, and tips for troubleshooting issues like broken or stuck cables.
Best Wheels for Drag Racing | Lightest Drag Wheels & Beadlocks
by Dan Schechner - Posted in Tech
2/18/2025
Discover the best wheels for drag racing; the lightest options, beadlocks, and SFI certified wheels and learn how beadlock wheels work